🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to reinitiate atomic negotiations with Washington on condition that it is approached with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has announced.

The Iranian diplomat declared only diplomacy was effective, and disclosed new appeals had been made by intermediaries to restart talks with the US government. He said Iran possessed no undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran could not yet permit the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect struck enrichment centers for security reasons.

Walking a Challenging Path

Araghchi is navigating a difficult path since Iran wishes not to appear to be proceeding from a stance of vulnerability, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged more resilient militarily and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to enrich uranium within its borders that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the deadlock in the previous talks.

Earlier Talks Suddenly Concluded

The previous five rounds of negotiations between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and acrimonious termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, targeted Tehran's atomic facilities in a 12-day war that concluded with Donald Trump declaring the locations had been eliminated. Subsequently, Western states used their privilege to reimpose international penalties, but Iran insists they have not had a significant effect.

Perfect Agreement Proposed

Iran's diplomats stated they felt they had reached a "magic solution" to the nuclear fuel concern in earlier negotiations, when it was settled an local partnership with US participation could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since local refinement would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's enrichment initiative was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that American atomic experts could function on Iranian soil, but that was a reasonable assumption of the partnership suggestion. Officials stated on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy the American negotiator only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Situation

Iranian officials stated the cooperative arrangement was now withdrawn, but it seems highly likely the suggestion could be revived in various formats if discussions reopen.

Trump in recent days stated he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to resume discussions, but privately Tehran representatives claim they are not yet receiving clear proposals from the United States either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of passivity in the face of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran states negotiations is not part of a show.

Political Position

In his remarks to the forum, aimed to depict the US as a dominant force that exploits the idea of worldwide standards, the foreign minister stated the fortnight-long engagement revealed the dispute could not be ended by armed force. He stated the strikes started with a Washington's ultimatum for an total Iran submission and concluded with an absolute demand for a ceasefire.

Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with full US knowledge and coordination, making faith hard to reestablish.

Dialogue Continues the Primary Answer

The foreign minister stated: "Tehran was not the one that had fled dialogue; it was the United States and the Western nations that had repeatedly attempted to impose their will during the discussions. Diplomacy can still be viable and stays the ultimate resolution to resolve disputes, but its standards, rules and principles must be adhered to."

"If they speak to the Iranian people with the language of dignity and honor, they will receive a answer in the same approach."

Recovery and Recovery

In what is portrayed by Tehran representatives as the battle of recovery and rebuilding, Araghchi said he was assured Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than before 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been restored. We gained many lessons from this war; we have discovered our personal limitations and the shortcomings of the opponent."

He continued: "We managed to survive this conflict. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to destroy, stays intact. The sites and equipment, if destroyed, will be rebuilt; what is essential is the determination of the Iranian people and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but were unable to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have developed more powerful, more cohesive, and more supportive of the government and the nation in the face of this assault."